The Delhi Excessive Courtroom on Wednesday dismissed a petition filed towards the demolition of Pracheen Shiv Mandir located close to metropolis’s Geeta Colony and positioned close to Yamuna Flood Plains by Delhi Growth Authority (DDA). Whereas rejecting the petition, the excessive courtroom stated it goes with out saying that Lord Shiva doesn’t want our safety; quite, we, the folks, search his safety and blessings.
A bench of Justice Dharmesh Sharma noticed that Pracheen Shiv Mandir Avam Akhada Samiti, which filed the plea did not reveal any authorized rights current with it in order to proceed to make use of and occupy the civic property for operating the temple companies.
“In view of the forgoing dialogue, this Courtroom unhesitatingly finds that the petitioner society has miserably did not reveal any authorized rights current with it in order to proceed to make use of and occupy the civic property for operating the temple companies.”
The courtroom additional stated that the half-hearted plea by the realized counsel for the petitioner that Lord Shiva, being the deity of the temple, have to be additionally impleaded within the current matter is a determined try to provide an altogether completely different color to your complete dispute to sub-serve the vested curiosity of its members.
“It goes with out saying that Lord Shiva doesn’t want our safety; quite, we, the folks, search his safety and blessings. There might be no iota of doubt that Lord Shiva could be happier if the Yamuna River mattress and the flood plains areas are cleared of all encroachments and unauthorised development,” the courtroom dominated.
The excessive courtroom gave the temple society 15 days time to take away the idols and different spiritual objects within the temple and to position the identical in another temple.
“In the event that they fail to take action, the respondent DDA is directed to make sure that the idols are positioned in another temple, or as could also be directed by the Spiritual Committee if they’re approached for any solutions,” the excessive courtroom stated whereas passing the order.
The excessive courtroom additional stated that the DDA shall be at liberty to hold out demolition of the unauthorised development, and the petitioner society and its members shall not trigger any obstacle or obstacles in such a demolition course of.